Despite my continued disgust for the BP oil spill and the Obama administration’s utter lack of communication and leadership on the matter, I am going to shift gears to some local Massachusetts politics. In the face of the worst environmental crisis this nation has seen, I figure it will provide some needed comedic relief. To me, local politics has always been a comedy. Personally, if I don’t observe local politics by its comedic potential, it is only seems boring. I generally stay away from the Boston Globe as I do local news broadcasts because, other than make me laugh out loud when I’m stoned, they both kill more brain cells than the pot does.
So, for all you non-Massachusetts residents, let me set up this latest local joke for you: imagine a state (a Commonwealth actually) that is often described as being the most liberal in the union and imagine that it is a place that has legalized gay marriage and has decriminalized pot, but, that it’s also a place where a very scared group of Puritanical citizens frequently immerge to fight political battles that most other states sit back and laugh at. The latest such occurrence appeared in the Boston Globe yesterday in the debate whether Massachusetts should legalize casinos within the state. Now, for someone from upstate New York, I am quite familiar with the culture of casinos. Where I’m from, you’re never more than an hour-and-a-half from a casino. You either hit the road for the Canadian border and Province of Ontario or you drive east to your nearest upstate Indian reservation where there are few Native Americans left but an abundance of black jack tables. And the nature of these casinos is just as advertised—they are contained resorts built to fulfill the otherwise suppressed hedonistic pleasures of the locals. You know exactly why you’re going there and you know exactly what you’re going to get. The only difference is that, if you’re in Canada, you’ll get to actually touch the strippers in between your gambling.
But, there’s no such luck in Massachusetts. That’s because we are the state of no happy hours. We are the state where you need to suck the Attorney General’s dick in order to get yourself a liquor license (that’s a Martha Coakley joke for all you non-locals). We are a state where wine cannot be sold in supermarkets, where beer cannot be carried in gas stations, and where bars are made to close no later than later than 2AM. Maybe it’s because I’m from New York, but I’ve never understood why this Puritanical mentality continues to exist in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts four fucking centuries after the English Reformation. Oh, I’ve had plenty of my prick Massachusetts friends try to explain this one to me, but it’s never done any good. I still think the idea that the citizens of Massachusetts need to be protected from the lechery within themselves is hilariously tragic and about as convoluted as the goddamned Reformation itself.
The arguments made by those that oppose the casinos are the same as they’ve always been: that gambling ruins families, that gambling is a compulsion as serious as drug addiction, and that the casino solution to raise state revenue is nothing more than a tax on the poor. I’m a mind-over-matter guy myself, though, and I say if your drunk Uncle Jimmy wants to blow his family’s mortgage payment at the casino, he probably had it coming to him one way or another. It’s not like these addictions aren’t being fed on the internet today anyways. And it’s also not like the ‘convenience’ stores on my block aren’t already mini-casinos that make most their profits off the degenerates purchasing fifty-dollar scratch tickets rather than the yuppies buying OJ.
I’ve never seen more bullshit in my life than when these Puritanical State Senators stand up on Beacon Hill and say that casinos prey upon the addictions of the weak. If by ‘prey’ they mean turn a profit like the dozen liquor stores a mile radius from my apartment that wait for us alcoholics to stroll in everyday, then I would have to agree. But if they’re telling us that we should be afraid of other people’s irresponsibility, well that’s just childish bullshit. Personally, I’m not a gambler, but I’m certainly aware of my own vices—my drinking, my pot smoking, my womanizing—and I don’t leave it up to other people to save me from myself. If I wanted to be saved, I’d move to Canada where I travel once a year to proudly walk their safe streets with my vices worn on my sleeve and tip my cap to the other patrons that have decided to join me in an evening of planned revelry. But why would I want to be saved? It would put me out of a blog.
- Freemont

